|
The
word “church” in our English Bibles is translated from the
Greek word “ekklesia”. This word is also translated as
“assembly” in Acts 19:32, 39, and 41; Acts 7:38, R. V.;
and as “congregation” in Heb. 2:12, R. V., as well as an
alternate reading in Mt.18:17, R. V.
In relation to Christians, the word “church” is given two
different applications in the New Testament. (1) The totality
of all the saved (redeemed, saints, etc.) of the whole world.
Such usage is found in Mt. 16:18, Eph. 1:22, Col. 1:18. We
generally speak of this usage as the “universal church”.
(2) A group of Christians who have united together to work and
worship as a single unit. Such usage is found in Acts 20:28, 1
Cor. 1:2, Gal. 1:13,1 Thes. 1:1. We usually speak of this as
the “local church”.
In Acts 14:23, and Phil. 1:1, we find that the “local
church” is given a plurality of elders whose task is:
(1) to “oversee” (Acts 20:28, I Peter 5:2) ; literally,
“to look over — or after — a flock”. (2) To
“feed (or tend) the flock” (Acts 20:28, 1 Peter5:2). (3)
Teaching (1Tim. 3:2). (4) Protect (Tit. 1:9). (5) “Rule”
(I Tim. 5:17, Heb. 13:17); literally, “To stand before” or
“To be at the head as leader”. (6) To be an example, or
pattern (1 Peter 5:3). (7) To watch after, and give an account
to God for, souls in their charge (Heb. 13:17).
If elders adequately perform their God-given tasks, and
discharge their responsibilities to the flock, they must know
who are members of the “local flock — church”, which
they oversee. This necessitates what is generally called
“being identified” or “placing membership”. By this
process the elders know that you are not “just a visitor”
but that you intend to “work and worship” as a member of
that congregation, and to be under their oversight.
The scriptures indicate that Christians should be not only a
part of the “universal church”, but also a part of a
“local church”. When Paul arrived at Jerusalem, he
endeavored to “join himself” to the disciples there (Acts
9:26). Paul and Barnabas later became “identified” with
the church at Antioch (Acts 11:26, 13:1).
Though it is conceivable that conditions may exist, where for
a time one is a member only of the “universal church”
(Acts 8:35-39), he should, as soon as possible, become
“identified” with a “local church”, as did Paul and
Barnabas (Phil. 4:9). If there is not a faithful congregation
of the Lord’s people meeting in that area, he should begin
one. Thus, the idea that one can be a member of a “local
church” where he has not worshipped for weeks, months, and
sometimes years, is denominational in origin and unscriptural
in concept.
Some, to avoid responsibilities and discipline will become
“floating members”; just visiting around from place to
place, never “identifying” with any one congregation. If
these people become needful of discipline, and are approached
by the elders of any of the congregations where they attend,
their immediate reply is; “but, we’re not members of your
congregation!” Therefore, to eliminate this, when we move to
another town, or permanently sever our connection with a
congregation, we should find another faithful congregation of
the Lord’s people and “join” ourselves to them; settle
down and go to work.
Also, we should not lightly sever our connection with one
congregation and “place membership” with another.
Naturally, if we move from one town to another, it becomes
essential that we do so at once. Sometime we may deem it
necessary to become part of another “local church” within
the same general area where we have previously worked and
worshipped because: (1) We feel it necessary for our own
spiritual growth. (2) We feel that such will enable us to be
more effective and useful for the Lord. (3)There are
unscriptural doctrines and/or practices in the former
congregation which we are unable to correct. However; let us
be sure that we can substantiate our claim of such. (4)
There is such a strong difference of opinion as to the
advisability — not scripturalness — of a particular work
or activity that we feel it is better for peace and harmony
that we work and worship elsewhere (Acts 15:36-41). If this is
the reason, when at all possible, we should “forbear” with
one another (Eph. 4:2). (5) We have been unscripturally and
unjustifiable “withdrawn” from and are unable to get the
mistake corrected. This sometimes happens. But let’s be
positive it is they that are wrong, and not us! Also, that we
have done ALL in our power to rectify the error!
When we leave one congregation and become “joined” to
another, we should be ENTIRELY POSITIVE that our motives are
honest and justifiable. It should never be done: (1) To put
pressure on the former congregation to honor our particular
whim. (2) Because the truth has been preached and our toes
thereby stepped on. (3) To escape discipline or
responsibilities. (4) Through jealousy and envy because we
have been passed over for some particular work. If it be for
such reasons as these, we will soon be dissatisfied with the
new congregation!
When one “identifies” himself with a congregation, he
should be admitted into the fellowship of that “local
church”. If there seems any reason to doubt or question his
previous faithfulness, the elders should exert every effort
possible to satisfy themselves that this person is faithful
and not in need of restoration. If it is found that he has not
been faithful, or transferred membership to escape needed
discipline, then the church should institute disciplinary
action against this new member just as they would against any
other. Likewise, if we seek to sever our connection with one
congregation that we may be “joined” to a religious body
in error, the elders have no course open but to begin
disciplinary procedure.
James Dennison
|